Strict Scrutiny (The Morning Show)

In the context of the Apple TV+ drama series, The Morning Show, "Strict Scrutiny" does not refer to the legal concept used in constitutional law to assess the validity of government action. Instead, within the show's narrative, it represents a heightened level of investigation, examination, and public awareness surrounding the characters and events, particularly those related to misconduct or scandal.

While the term is rooted in legal terminology denoting rigorous judicial review, its application in The Morning Show is metaphorical. It describes the intense media pressure, internal investigations, and public judgment experienced by the characters after allegations of sexual misconduct and a toxic work environment surface at the UBA network. This "strict scrutiny" manifests as:

• Intensified Media Coverage: News outlets relentlessly report on the unfolding scandals, dissecting every detail and seeking to uncover new information.
• Internal Investigations: UBA initiates internal investigations to determine the extent of the misconduct and identify those responsible. These investigations are often fraught with political maneuvering and competing agendas.
• Public Opinion and Backlash: The characters face intense scrutiny from the public, leading to boycotts, protests, and damage to their reputations.
• Personal and Professional Consequences: The strict scrutiny has profound consequences for the characters, leading to job losses, strained relationships, and mental health struggles.

Therefore, "Strict Scrutiny" in The Morning Show is used to depict the multifaceted and pervasive consequences of allegations and the process of uncovering the truth, rather than a direct application of the legal definition. It highlights the social and emotional impact of being under intense observation and judgment.