Fragging

Fragging refers to the deliberate killing or attempted killing of a superior officer, non-commissioned officer, or other leader by a subordinate, typically in a military context. The term originated during the Vietnam War, purportedly due to the use of fragmentation grenades to carry out such acts, allowing the perpetrator to remain anonymous or to make the incident appear accidental. However, any means of killing a superior officer by a subordinate with intent can be considered fragging.

While the term is most closely associated with the Vietnam War, instances of subordinates killing superiors have occurred in various military conflicts throughout history. Factors often cited as contributing to fragging include:

• Low morale: Widespread disillusionment with the conflict or leadership decisions can fuel resentment.
• Poor leadership: Incompetent or abusive officers can erode the trust and respect of their subordinates.
• Hazardous assignments: Orders perceived as reckless or unnecessary can lead to desperation and violent resistance.
• Racial tensions: In some cases, pre-existing racial prejudices within the military can exacerbate conflicts between superiors and subordinates.

Fragging is a serious crime under military law, carrying severe penalties, including imprisonment and, in some cases, capital punishment. The act is deeply disruptive to military discipline and cohesion, undermining unit effectiveness and trust. Beyond the legal consequences, fragging also carries a significant social and ethical stigma within the military community. The investigation of fragging incidents can be complex, often involving witness intimidation, a code of silence amongst troops, and difficulties in establishing intent.