Folkewall

Folkewall is a neologism, primarily used within online communities and technical subcultures, referring to a perceived or actual phenomenon where a technological or social solution is maintained and/or perpetuated not due to its inherent efficiency or superiority, but because of deeply ingrained cultural habits, assumptions, or a general resistance to change within a group or organization. The term is often used pejoratively, implying that the persistence of the solution is less about rational merit and more about the power of collective inertia or social norms.

The concept behind "Folkewall" suggests that alternative, potentially superior solutions exist, but are disregarded or actively suppressed due to the strength of the established "folk way" of doing things. This "folk way" can encompass a variety of factors, including:

• Habit and Familiarity: People are simply used to the existing solution and resistant to the perceived effort of learning or adopting something new.
• Shared Understanding: The existing solution, even if inefficient, is widely understood and forms a common ground for collaboration and communication. Switching to a new solution could disrupt this shared understanding.
• Social Cohesion: Using the same tools and methods can contribute to a sense of belonging and shared identity within a group. A change could threaten this social fabric.
• Fear of Disruption: Introducing a new solution carries the risk of unforeseen problems or temporary dips in productivity. The perceived benefits of the new solution may not outweigh the potential costs.
• Lack of Resources or Incentives: Implementing a new solution may require significant investment in training, infrastructure, or other resources. The organization or individuals involved may not have the necessary resources or the motivation to make the change.

The term "Folkewall" draws parallels to concepts like path dependency and organizational inertia, but specifically highlights the role of cultural and social factors in maintaining the status quo. It is often used to critique situations where technical or organizational progress is hindered by ingrained habits and resistance to change.