📖 WIPIVERSE

🔍 Currently registered entries: 50,114건

Gomastha

A Gomastha (also spelled Gumasta, Gomasta, or Gumastha) was an Indian agent of the British East India Company. The term, originating in Persian, generally referred to an agent or clerk. In the context of the Company's operations, Gomasthas held significant responsibilities, primarily in procuring goods, overseeing production, and managing trade on behalf of the Company, especially in areas outside of the major Presidency towns.

Their duties included:

  • Procurement: Gomasthas were responsible for securing commodities, notably textiles, indigo, and opium, from local weavers, farmers, and artisans. They often advanced money to producers, essentially tying them to the Company's demands and prices.

  • Quality Control: Ensuring the quality of goods met the Company's standards was also a crucial aspect of their role. This involved inspecting goods and enforcing adherence to specifications.

  • Supervision of Production: In some instances, Gomasthas oversaw production directly, setting up factories or workshops and managing the labor involved.

  • Trade and Commerce: Gomasthas played a pivotal role in facilitating trade, managing inventories, and handling the distribution of goods.

The actions of Gomasthas were frequently a source of tension and exploitation. They were often accused of using their position to coerce producers into accepting unfair prices, manipulate markets to their advantage (and the Company's), and exercise undue influence over local economies. The power wielded by Gomasthas and their sometimes unethical practices contributed significantly to the economic grievances that ultimately fueled resistance against British rule in India. The use and abuse of the Dastak system (duty-free trade permits) by the East India Company and its officials, including Gomasthas, further exacerbated these problems.

The role of the Gomastha diminished with the increasing centralization of the East India Company's administration and the introduction of more direct forms of control. Nevertheless, the term remains historically significant as it represents a key figure in the complex and often exploitative economic relationship between the British East India Company and the Indian populace.